Mother Jones; Scott Olson\/Getty<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n If you want<\/span> to understand U.S. politics, take the train.<\/p>\n The Trump administration\u2019s federal budget request for the next fiscal year includes steep cuts to passenger rail. According to an analysis by the High Speed Rail Alliance<\/a>, a pro-rail advocacy group, the budget proposal would slash Federal Railroad Administration funding by 81 percent. This includes a 69 percent funding cut to Amtrak.<\/p>\n But rural Republicans have historically relied on passenger rail. They also elected the same administration now cutting this service that they rely on. At this point, this paradox is nothing new: From cutting healthcare subsidies<\/a> to immigration dragnets<\/a> to costly and devastating wars<\/a>, President Donald Trump\u2019s assault on human rights and domestic programs has ensnared the very people whose support he has relied on.<\/p>\n So, how is this playing out with voters in real time, particularly ahead of the midterm elections? <\/p>\n I took the train to find out.<\/p>\n From Newark to D.C. to Pittsburgh, I met people across political lines. People who love Trump, and people who want to invoke the 25th Amendment. People who hope cuts to trains and other services will change conservative hearts and minds, and people who can imagine passenger rail funding going to things they view as more important.<\/p>\n Across these differences, one common theme emerged: Daily life in the U.S. right now costs way too much. To me, it underlined the way power has worked before Trump and will work after. If people who have been deprived of wealth and influence unite against the power players leveraging those things against us, then what could we achieve?<\/p>\n
\n\t<\/p>\n
Get your news from a source that\u2019s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily<\/em>.<\/a><\/div>\n